![]() But when I actually dig into it, I have really never seen anyone with a competent vision of what a "competing browser" is supposed to look like. It is so common for people to try to play armchair CEO. I have seen these type of comments pop up in every Firefox thread on HN. I have no evidence for or against this, but my greatest fear is that the people at Mozilla who were passionate about the same things that I am passionate about have left out of frustration and the only ones left are there for the lifestyle and hipsterness of "working in tech" at a non-profit in a trendy city. There is no universe in which Firefox is going to successfully compete against Google at their own game, especially when Google is _still_ the majority source of their funding. It's because at the end of the day, _I_ am the one in control of my computers, not some product manager who needs bullet points on his or her annual review. It's not because it's easier to use (they are not), it is not because it has more bells and whistles (they do not). There's a reason I run Linux and BSD on every computing device I own, instead of Windows or Mac. The best time to do this was a few years back when all of this was becoming obvious, but now with massive popular distrust of large tech companies like Facebook and Google making daily news, the second best time is now. Once it was clear that Chrome was destined to cater to the masses, Firefox should have done a hard pivot with an emphasis on privacy and putting the user in control of their browsing experience. Lean into technical excellence and drop the obsessive ui/ux nonsense. Firefox used to be a Lamborghini, it doesn't need training wheels and balloon bumpers. To put it bluntly, fuck grandma, she doesn't know what the hell she's doing anyway. ![]() Taking direction from anonymous "averages" makes development a race to the bottom.įirefox developments over the last couple years feels like what would happen if you put grandma in charge of trying to make things better. Taking direction from technical users, or so-called power users, can give the application improvements in nuanced and technical uses. ![]() Ignoring the people who actually take the time to communicate problems in favor of interpreted telemetry is exactly why Firefox is losing. Remove actual, intentional human communication from the loop and you're lost at sea - anyone can make the anonymous data mean anything, and then it's whomever can make the cleverest chart or analysis of the data that ends up directing decisions. That said, we do plan to achieve parity with NextDNS, but that's going to happen over a period of time since our team of 3 is stretched thin between building the firewall (too much complexity!) and the dns (too much work!).Ī technically competent user's feedback should be weighted at least one, if not tens or hundreds of orders of magnitude greater than anonymously gathered telemetry. We support DNS-based content-blocking too (out of sheer need for it from our users) but believe the right avenue to block content is either in-app where possible (like uBlockOrigin in Firefox) or at the IP-layer (not DNS), and hence we also build a Firewall (due to limited time, the RethinkDNS + Firewall app is Android-only, for the time being ). RethinkDNS is the reference serverless DoH deployment, if you will. Today, the serverless DoH stub resolver deploys to cloudflare workers but we plan to support /deploy and fly.io soon (already have it working in our development branches but the incompatibility between node and deno is causing a bit of pain to merge with mainline). Our primary objective is anti-censorship, and so, we make it simple for folks to deploy their own DoH (which means all our code is open source). The included dejsonlz4 (BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License) and jsonlz4 are the binaries from PortableApps.Hi: NextDNS is the gold-standard and many capable alternatives have cropped up in its wake in the recent times like windscribe's but RethinkDNS is not it.LibreWolf by ohfp, stanzabird, fxbrit, maltejur, bgstack15 et al.LibreWolf Portable will not use %USERPROFILE%\.librewolf\. If you need a portable, you can put it inside the profile folder Profiles\Default.Optionally, put LibreWolf-WinUpdater.exe in the same folder to automatically apply updates when starting LibreWolf-Portable.exe (checks for new versions once a day).It already contains a compiled version of the project hosted here. The portable version and an installed instance of LibreWolf can be run simultaneously. It allows for changing paths (so you can put it on removable storage) and will clean up remnants on the system after closing the browser. This is the portable launcher that's bundled with LibreWolf. By ltGuillaume: Codeberg | GitHub | Buy me a beer □
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |